Are Muslim boys are enticing Hindu girls as part of a ‘conspiracy Love and sex you never got from your marriage

Maharashtra’s criminal investigation department (CID) meant to probe high-profile cases will now investigate love affairs that have

resulted in marriages between Hindu girls and Muslim boys.
CID has been told to check whether Muslim boys are enticing Hindu girls as part of a ‘conspiracy’. Minister of state for home (rural) Nitin Raut had announced this in the assembly on the last day of Maharashtra’s budget session a fortnight back.
Participating in a calling attention notice, Eknath Khadse and Devendra Fadnavis had said young Muslim boys in rural areas were wooing Hindu college girls and then marrying them. According to them, this was part of a ‘conspiracy’ to increase the population of the community. Khadse even alleged that some Hindu girls had been sent to Gulf.
In his reply, Raut admitted such incidents were happening. ‘‘I will initiate an inquiry into this,’’ the minister had promised. But the opposition demanded that he order a CID probe as the issue was serious. Subsequently, Raut gave in to their demands.
CID chief SPS Yadav said, ‘‘We have yet to receive the order. The first thing we will have to do is to check whether such an inquiry is in consonance with the CID manual. If not, we will inform the government about the norms,’’ he said. ‘‘If government persists, we will decide on how to carry out these investigations.’’
Raut’s announcement has not gone down well with his cabinet colleagues and leaders of the Muslim community. Senior NCP leader and labour minister Nawab Malik said BJP has political interest in raising such issues.
Congress leader and minister of state for home (urban) Arif Naseem Khan said there is no provision in law where member of a particular community can be stopped from marrying a girl\boy of another community. ‘‘If any case where a girl\boy is pressurised into getting married to member of other community, the offender should be certainly punished,’’ he added.
Refuting the allegations made by Malik and Khan, Fadnavis said, ‘‘Had we wanted to politicise the issue, we would have carried out morcha and protest, instead we demanded CID inquiry that shows that our intention was not to gain political mileage of the issue.’’
You thought the rich and beautiful are happily married. You thought wrong. They are as unhappy as the poor and the plain looking. Why is
Tiger Woods and Elin
Love and sex you never got from your marriage

everybody looking for a lover?

With each passing day, there are more and more women crawling out of Tiger’s woodwork. Nightclub hostesses, porn stars, TV presenters, waitresses. The latest figure on the number of women in Tiger Wood’s married life besides his wifeElin is 10, a figure that is unlikely to stand the test of time.

We tend to believe Super Man is someone who flies around with chuds worn over his pants and saves the world from aliens who will curl their lip at anything less than total destruction. Actually, a Super Man is anyone who does what no man can do better. Muhammad Ali was one. Garry Kasparov is another. Bill Gates a third.

Tiger Woods can see a hole in the grass 300 yards far and he is better than anyone born yet to swing and slip a ball into it smooth as a coin in a slot. Woods is one of our Super Men. Besides, he is tall and handsome and worth over $500 million. And married to a pretty pout like Elin.

Why is he looking for sex – and, perhaps, love – outside marriage?

It is not just Woods, of course. There are any numbers of beautiful people who have seemingly got everything, but who are looking for more outside home.

Consider a few names: Hugh Grant and Elizabeth Hurley were almost as good as married. And then Grant bought some sex from a prostitute, Divine Brown, in Sunset Boulevard. He lost Hurley.

Ethan Hawke was with Uma Thurman for a while. But he couldn’t bear that happiness for too long and strayed. And Thurman walked out.

Former New York governor Eliot Spitzer had everything going, but he still cast his eye around. What he found was Ashley Alexander Dupre. Clearly, sufficient is never enough.

There are numerous examples in India as well. Film stars, cricket players, ordinary folk. Even Gods. Consider the case of Shiva. When Shiva falls in love with Mohini – Vishnu in the guise of a beautiful woman – he not only betrays his wife Parvathy, but also violates the traditional gender code. In the process, Shiva goes against the idea of marriage as set out in the ancient Dharma Shastras as well.

According to the Shastras, marriage is meant to fulfill three functions: Praja, Dharma, and Rati. Praja ischildren for perpetuation of one’s family, Dharma is fulfillment of responsibilities, and Rati is friendship and sexual pleasure.

Shiva’s deviation is indicative of how gods themselves can’t resist temptation of the senses. Hindu mythology is loaded with such dalliances.

Behavioural scientists would argue that evolution has a lot to do with sexualattraction. Sex is how you ensure your immortality, the survival of your unique pool of genes. Celibacy, which a lot of marriages enforce, is slow suicide.

Marriage tends to stabilise you and helps you to focus on work that you do with your brains and not with your balls. As the years go by, the little sex and even less attention you get from your spouse work as rudimentary safety valves so the pressure cooker of passions don’t explode. In the end, of course, you get used to a life without love or sex. Indeed, in the end you get used to anything – even your spouse.

The moral majority considers adultery a crime. The facile piety of it may contribute a sense of moral superiority to those who either believe in, or affect, that magisterial stance. But, equally, love and fornication outside the fortress of marriage evoke more confusion than contempt among the ranks.

Which is why across the world it has met with mixed response. In India, adultery is punishable with a maximum sentence of five years. In Pakistan, death sentence is more like it, though the law is loaded against women.

In the US, the law varies from state to state. An adulterer could get a life sentence if he gave full head to his penetralia in, say, Michigan. If he did the same thing in Maryland, he gets away with a 10 dollar fine. In the more liberal Europe, they have come to accept adultery as a civilisational vice: man and woman must cheat on their partners so they can afford their little satisfactions – a little bit of love and sex on the side – so they get something free, perhaps that elusive sensation of life. You take a dutiful wife, you get a wild lover free – almost. In Austria, the Netherlands, Belgium, Finland or Sweden sleeping with a man or woman outside your marriage is not recognised as a punishable offence. Wisely, maybe, since nearly 55 out of every 100 marriages end up in divorce in a country like Sweden.

In contrast, in India, only about 1 marriage out of a 100 reaches the divorce stage. Despite the low percentage, this is not a country of happy matrimony. Counseling centres and family courts are packed these days with acrimonious couples.

The most chaste amongst us are glad-eyed. Deep within, our search for the perfect partner is never over. Polygamy and polyandry offer their own loaded solutions to our primal needs. They are, in a certain sense, richer than an excruciating monogamous situation where both husband and wife look in vain to access all their joys from one source.

In polygamy, what one wife holds back, the other offers. Sex with A, Love with B, Poetry with C, EMIs with D, etc. The apportioning of the various functions to various people makes no one person hugely powerful. It is, after a fashion, a democratic deal.

But, in normal course, the option is not available to you. So what do you do? You turn The Great Indian Auto-Censor. You do away with your needs. You no longer look for sex every night at home. You don’t even look for sex once in a month or, as in many cases, not even once a year. You could do without sex, what the hell. Or, go steady with your hand.

Almost as worse, you stop looking for love and friendship with which sex is deeply linked. You might have been ready for such soft stuff when you were really young. But that was in another country; besides, the wench is dead. Certainly, now, you are not prepared for it. To be vulnerable all over again! To lower your guard in the presence of your 24×7 companion, who might actually make use of it in the very first opportunity! Surely, you have by now learnt to protect yourself?

In any case, responsibilities have taken over and the relationship you aspired for has deteriorated into role-playing. You are wife, you are mother, you are Lactating Machine. Or, you are husband, you are father, you are ATM.

Marriage dehumanises you. You are no longer an individual, whose complex of desires would normally require at least four partners to share its gravitas. You cut it all down and become the stranger driving a car, going to office, coming back home to TV. You see more of Bollywood stars on the screen than your partner in real life. In fact, you know more about the stars than your wife, who is anyway for keeps. You start looking for a lover so the beautiful aspects of your personality can bloom. But, it will take time. Meanwhile, you sit back and judge Tiger Woods, who should have driven that car carefully and not got into an accident. The accident undid him, not the girls. And then it comes to you, sudden as a slap, that not even the Super Man has got enough of love and sex from his marriage. You nod your head: that figures. At last, you and Tiger Woods are on the same page. Surely, marriage is a great leveler, you cleverly observe to yourself. Ah, you close your eyes, lean back in the chair thinking about the pretty woman who stood close to you in the elevator this morning. You wonder what perfume she was wearing and whether you would run into her again.

Sex is good for your health
If you thought the only benefit of sex was, well, pleasure, here’s some news for you. Making love is good for adults. And making love regularly
is even better! Not only does it help you sleep well, relieve stress and burn calories, there are several other reasons why you need to have sex more often.
IMPROVES CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH
A recent study says that men who have sex more than twice a week, had lesser risk of getting a heart attack than men who had sex less than once a month.
REDUCES STRESS
Stressed out with work or family problems? Don’t let it affect your performance in the bedroom. Not only will having sex improve your mood, but a study has proved that folks who indulge in regular bedroom activities can handle stress better and are happier people generally.
RELIEVES PAIN
If you’re using your headache as an excuse not to make love, stop doing it. Just when you’re about to have an orgasm, the level of the hormone – oxytocin, increases by five times. The release of endorphins reduces aches and pains.
PROMOTES LONGEVITY
When one has an orgasm, a hormone called Dehydroepiandrosterone is released, which improves your immunity and keeps the skin healthy. Men who have at least two orgasms a week live longer than men who have sex just once every few weeks.
INCREASES BLOOD CIRCULATION
Because your heart rate increases while having sex, fresh blood is supplied to your organs and cells. While used blood is removed, you also discard things from your body that cause you to feel tired.
YOU SLEEP BETTER
Notice that just after you make love, you get a much relaxed sleep thereafter. A good night’s sleep will make you healthy overall.
IMPROVES OVERALL FITNESS
If you find going to the gym mundane or working out at home a task, here’s another way to help you lose the flab and keep in shape. Regular sex will do wonders for your waistline. Half an hour of love making burns more than 80 calories! Hope these reasons are
motivating enough.

Sex is good for your healthIf you thought the only benefit of sex was, well, pleasure, here’s some news for you. Making love is good for adults. And making love regularly
is even better! Not only does it help you sleep well, relieve stress and burn calories, there are several other reasons why you need to have sex more often.
IMPROVES CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH A recent study says that men who have sex more than twice a week, had lesser risk of getting a heart attack than men who had sex less than once a month.
REDUCES STRESS Stressed out with work or family problems? Don’t let it affect your performance in the bedroom. Not only will having sex improve your mood, but a study has proved that folks who indulge in regular bedroom activities can handle stress better and are happier people generally.
RELIEVES PAIN If you’re using your headache as an excuse not to make love, stop doing it. Just when you’re about to have an orgasm, the level of the hormone – oxytocin, increases by five times. The release of endorphins reduces aches and pains.
PROMOTES LONGEVITY When one has an orgasm, a hormone called Dehydroepiandrosterone is released, which improves your immunity and keeps the skin healthy. Men who have at least two orgasms a week live longer than men who have sex just once every few weeks.
INCREASES BLOOD CIRCULATION Because your heart rate increases while having sex, fresh blood is supplied to your organs and cells. While used blood is removed, you also discard things from your body that cause you to feel tired.
YOU SLEEP BETTER Notice that just after you make love, you get a much relaxed sleep thereafter. A good night’s sleep will make you healthy overall.
IMPROVES OVERALL FITNESS If you find going to the gym mundane or working out at home a task, here’s another way to help you lose the flab and keep in shape. Regular sex will do wonders for your waistline. Half an hour of love making burns more than 80 calories! Hope these reasons are motivating enough.

NEW DELHI: A woman in a live-in relationship should be entitled to maintenance if she is deserted by her man, the National Commission for Women
has said.

In far-reaching recommendations to the ministry of women and child development, the commission has sought a change in the definition of “wife” — as described in Section 125 of CrPC, which deals with maintenance — and suggested that it include women involved in a live-in relationships.

The move aims to harmonize other sections of the law with the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act that treats a live-in couple’s relationship on a par with that between a legally married husband and wife.

NCW also sought another significant amendment to Section 125, saying that said adultery should no longer be a ground for denying maintenance to a woman.

“We have found in 70% of divorce cases, adultery is used to discredit the woman. Not only is she thrown out of the house, but is also disgraced and denied her rights,” NCW chairperson Girija Vyas said.

Section 125 provides for maintenance of wife, children and parents, who cannot maintain themselves. Maintenance can only be claimed by a woman who is a wife, has either been divorced or has obtained divorce, or is legally separated and is not remarried.

Pointing to the need for broad-basing the definition of wife in the section, commission officials said there had been many cases where the man led the woman to believe that he was unmarried or was divorced or widowed and went through the formalities required by the Hindu Marriage Act or the custom governing him.

‘Long-term relationship valid to claim alimony’

The move by National Commission for Women to seek a change in the definition of “wife” is aimed at harmonizing other sections of law with the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act that treats a live-in couple’s relationship on a par with that between a legally married husband and wife.

NCW chairperson Girija Vyas said, “Even if the marriage is not registered, if the woman can provide enough proof of a long-term relationship,

her claim will stand.”

Children of such relationships can also claim maintenance from the father, according to the NCW suggestion. This has been supported by several Supreme Court orders too.

The commission has also suggested that parents seeking maintenance from their sons or daughters should be able to file a case from where they reside rather than from where their offspring live.

Rapid growth in population has led to a proportionate increase in the number of divorce cases. Many social factors are responsible for the spurt

in their numbers.

The most important reason is that women have started asserting their legitimate equal status in the family, refusing to be subjugated by their husbands for life as their grandmothers used to be.

On numerous occasions during hearing of matrimonial disputes, Justice Arijit Pasayat, a senior judge of the Supreme Court, had commented in lighter vein — “HinduMarriage Act (HMA) has broken more homes than it has united.” One such recent observation hit the headlines.

Divorce is not a new phenomenon but is as old as civilisation itself. Prior to codification of the Hindu personal law, there were ways and means to terminate a marriage, but it was so heavily loaded in favour of men that women’s opinion or grievances were seldom taken into account.

With the Constitution guaranteeing right to equality, codification of Hindu personal law — part of which is HMA — made men and women equal partners in a marriage.

Equal rights of women in marriage was one of the main considerations for a Bench comprising Justices Pasayat and S H Kapadia to direct all state governments on August 14, 2006, to compulsorily register marriages.

The aim was to make accountable unscrupulous husbands, who after deserting their wives for other women often denied their marriages taking advantage of the absence of documentary proof of their marriage to frustrate court orders directing them to pay alimony to their wives.

Justice Pasayat could not have seriously said that the law enacted to give equal rights to women in marriage had broken more homes, as he was convinced about the utility of having the marriages registered.

The law, thus, was enacted not to break marriages but to crystallise the rights of partners in marriage to help them live with self-respect.

In the older days, a woman married to a schizophrenic used to live on without complaining despite her husband being unable to consummate the marriage.

The fear of taunts from society used to make her swallow the mental torture. In 2006, a Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices Ruma Pal and A R Lakshmanan ruled that abstinence by husbands due to mental disorder was a valid ground for divorce for women.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s