Destroyed incriminating records between Gani Patail and Chief Minister Narendra Modi had carried out a criminal conspiracy to destroy the State Intelligence

In a setback to India`s fabled secular democracy, and with international ramifications, the Gujarat government has

 In a setback to India`s fabled secular democracy, and with international ramifications, the Gujarat government has destroyed incriminating records of the 2002 anti-Muslim pogroms, victims` lawyers and political opponents said on Thursday.

Najib don’t be a Surface Reformist . why such serious allegation is not being investigated? is this another not serious matter similar to the scorpene scandal currently under investigation by the french authorities? in the opinion that this hatchet AG Gani Patail must be brought before a RCI to answer All those allegations, Gani cannot remain as AG until after the RCI’s findings. Najib must do the right thing, suspend Gani Patail for now, he is too tainted. get rid of the bad apples before it is too late. 90% of the people on the ground are anti govt Conspiracy of the highest order. People of high positions getting together to venge their anger or to fulfill their own ambitions by fabricating evidence and physically abusing their victim. A full investigation must be carried out and it can only be done by throwing Umno out.With the details pertaining to his case slowly being exposed, Anwar should seriously consider to sue all those involved particularly Gani who is the main player in the whole sordid affair. The man has got away with too much already and someone must stop him. No one is willing to because he has the dirt on them but Anwar has got a good case now that Mat Zain is spilling the beans. Without booting Gani out, the judiciary will never recover from the damage done by Mahathir.Despite all his wrongdoings he was still promoted to AG during Tun Mahathir’s time and protected by the present regime. Perhaps it needs a corrupt man to protect the corrupt regime. This serves only to tarnish the integrity of the public service and I believe it also serves to dwindle the public service support for the present government. In the coming PRU13 its time to depose the umno baru and the whole bn regime.After all these allegations and counter allegations revealed about our erstwhile AG, how the heck can he remain Attorney General? He should at the very least be suspended pending further investigations. From all that I have read in recent times, he is not fit to hold the position of AG, unless a truly independent, parliamentary investigation is completed, and he is cleared, or otherwise. When it is against the opposition, prompt actions will be taken from the so-called authorities and the so-called pressure so-called NGO groups like Perkasa! But when it is against the illegitimate UMNO BARU government, a serious case like this one is like no case! How can we let a Satan to take care of the important chambers like the AGC? ABU!

The Congress party said the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government of Chief Minister Narendra Modi had carried out a criminal conspiracy to destroy the State Intelligence Bureau (SIB) records.Great power comes with heavy responsibilities and Gani & Musa abuse it to the the highest level ! and in Malaysia there are semi-gods that are above the law for ordinary Malaysians. Only God Almighty can judge them and mere mortals can only believe that justice will be done eventually. Dr. Abdul Rahman you are a bloody real disgrace to the medical profession. He should be struck off from the rolls but MMC has no guts to do that. With all your blatant lies, I hope you receive the harshest punishment by the Almighty now and in the next world. Gani Patail is also another bloody serial liar. He should be hanged in Dataran Merdeka.Alhamdulillah,Mohtar is now being judged in the place where he should be judged.No sympathy to him.He deserved it.Soon Musa Hassan will also be judge.So do the “doctor” Ab Rahman.He fit the description of a criminal more than a doctor.Gani Pigtail will also be judged.Now one including Sultan will escape his judgement.So remember you can do anything here. Today, no one can touch you but remember Allah SWT is watching you and sooner or later His punishment will fall on you. That is what Allah SWT has promised.All this shows the position of Power and influence that Gani Patail had way before becoming an AG. Well he was so prominent in the foreground and background on the DSAI’s “Black Eye Case”. DSAI was beaten to such an extent that he could have died. Yet the accused was let off with a mere slap on his wrist. Such grave injustice !!! Gani Patail grew from strength to strength, yet despite all the allegations against him, not even one charge was raised. I just wonder, just how powerful he his. My hypothesis is that he has enough evidence to pin down people in Power and thus cannot be touched.AG will enjoy his wrong doings in hell where GOD will never have mercy on him for betraying people. I never expected him to be one-sided. Sad for Malaysia to have this type of character as a AG. Gani Patail learn2 things from this :1. What is hidden in the dark will be exposed in the light and we live in the light; and 2. Read “Macbeth”. You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself because you have to answer for your misdeeds just as how you make sure people go to prison. Much as I never believe the police this man has set out uncontroverted facts without exculpating himself. No wonder you even fabricated evidence at the International Court and to cup it your son was a witness to your fabrication. Leadership by example The magnitude of the wrongdoings committed by Gani and Musa, who were abetted by Dr Abdul Rahman, is mind-boggling. But asking for an RCI to be instituted is pointless. Najib will never agree to it. Both Musa and Gani must surely have the dirt on him as well as other people in the BN, and they wouldn’t want to go down on their own. The only way that justice can be done is for BN to be removed from power.


EX-MATTRESS CARRIER SPEAKS HIS MIND: THE NOOSE TIGHTENS

Ex-Mattress Carrier speaks his mind: The Noose tightens Former Police Chief Musa Hassan has described the move by his detractors and those making damning allegations about his links with the underworld as a concerted effort to tarnish his reputation. Musa claimed that they went after him because he was the investigating officer in former Deputy … Read moreMAHATHIR’S STATE LICENSED CRIMINAL DISTANCING AS THE NOOSE TIGHTENS

related http://suarakeadilanmalaysia.wordpress.com/2012/06/10/musa-story-part1-clara-chooi-says-tan-sri-muhyiddin-yassin-admitted-dr-mahathir-the-serpent-in-the-grass

Pakistan`s human rights icon and UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief Asma Jehangir had met Mr Modi in 2008 to underscore her concerns. However, according to a Gujarat official, the records had already been destroyed in 2007.

“This is nothing short of a criminal conspiracy to see that the truth does not emerge. It clearly points out that the state government is trying to cover up the entire matter,” Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari said in New Delhi.

Alleging there was an attempt to `hide` the truth regarding the alleged involvement of Chief Minister Modi and his cabinet colleagues, representatives of victims and survivors demanded an independent inquiry under the supervision of the Supreme Court into the BJP government`s action.

Mr Tewari found it a `complete travesty` that documents pertaining to a `massacre and carnage`, which is under investigation of the highest court of the land and in which the “needle of suspicion is directly at the Chief Minister of Gujarat”, gets destroyed in this manner.

In the state capital, Gandhinagar, lawyer Mukul Sinha of the NGO Jan Sangharsh Manch, which represents some of riot victims, said: “It is a terrible thing for the government to do. We had a doubt that they had been destroyed.”

“Since all the allegations were against police officer for inactions and negligence, destruction of SIB records could have serious implications,” he said.

Now with the records destroyed it would be difficult to prove the allegations against the accused policemen and political leaders, Mr Sinha said.

“This could also affect judgment in the Godhra train burning case as the phone call records, movement records of police and political leaders prior, during and after the incident are no more,” he added.

Senior Gujarat counsel S. B. Vakil representing the state government in the Nanavati Commission, probing the 2002 violence, had on Wednesday told reporters that telephone call records, officers` movement registers and vehicle log books of the SIB pertaining to the period of 2002 riots were destroyed in 2007, as per government rules.

of the 2002 anti-Muslim pogroms, victims` lawyers and political opponents said on Thursday.

The Congress party said the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government of Chief Minister Narendra Modi had carried out a criminal conspiracy to destroy the State Intelligence Bureau (SIB) records.

Pakistan`s human rights icon and UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief Asma Jehangir had met Mr Modi in 2008 to underscore her concerns. However, according to a Gujarat official, the records had already been destroyed in 2007.

“This is nothing short of a criminal conspiracy to see that the truth does not emerge. It clearly points out that the state government is trying to cover up the entire matter,” Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari said in New Delhi.

Alleging there was an attempt to `hide` the truth regarding the alleged involvement of Chief Minister Modi and his cabinet colleagues, representatives of victims and survivors demanded an independent inquiry under the supervision of the Supreme Court into the BJP government`s action.

Mr Tewari found it a `complete travesty` that documents pertaining to a `massacre and carnage`, which is under investigation of the highest court of the land and in which the “needle of suspicion is directly at the Chief Minister of Gujarat”, gets destroyed in this manner.

In the state capital, Gandhinagar, lawyer Mukul Sinha of the NGO Jan Sangharsh Manch, which represents some of riot victims, said: “It is a terrible thing for the government to do. We had a doubt that they had been destroyed.”

“Since all the allegations were against police officer for inactions and negligence, destruction of SIB records could have serious implications,” he said.

Now with the records destroyed it would be difficult to prove the allegations against the accused policemen and political leaders, Mr Sinha said.

“This could also affect judgment in the Godhra train burning case as the phone call records, movement records of police and political leaders prior, during and after the incident are no more,” he added.

Senior Gujarat counsel S. B. Vakil representing the state government in the Nanavati Commission, probing the 2002 violence, had on Wednesday told reporters that telephone call records, officers` movement registers and vehicle log books of the SIB pertaining to the period of 2002 riots were destroyed in 2007, as per government rules.


EXCLUSIVE One would expect the Attorney-General’s Chambers to uphold justice and set the record straight by preventing cover-ups.

However, exactly the opposite happened in the infamous black-eye investigations with former Kuala Lumpur CID (Criminal Investigation Department) chief Mat Zain Ibrahim saying that despite the focus being on their then boss, inspector-general of police Abdul Rahim Noor, the police can hold their heads up high as the probe had cleared them.

NONEMat Zain Ibrahim (left)revealed in an exclusive interview with Malaysiakinithat there was never any attempt by the police to cover up the incidenton the night of Sept 20, 1999.

The Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) on the Black Eye in its 1999 report states “The manner in which all our police witnesses discharged their duty to the oath they took to tell us the truth, was very creditable.

“We hope that these observations will go some way to vindicate the reputation of the Royal Malaysian Police Force.”

Mat Zain, the investigating officer (IO) in the black-eye case said the RCI and the incident and the allegations of fabrication had in fact brought the Attorney-General’s Chambers’ integrity into disrepute.

He added although former IGP Musa Hassan, the IO in the sodomy I case, was alleged to have been involved in the underhand move willingly or otherwise, it was done in his own personal capacity.

anwar ibrahim black eye 080206The former top cop stressed that no orders had come from the higher-ups even from then premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad to cover up the matter as the PM had warned him personally on Oct 8, 1998, that the government would not hesitate in calling for a RCI if need be.

Mat Zain said Musa cannot claim ignorance of what incumbent attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail, then a senior prosecutor, was doing as he had acted as an intermediary for the late and present AGs and Bukit Aman as well as himself (Mat Zain).

Musa had in an exclusive interview with Malaysiakini last monthadmitted he took Anwar Ibrahim’s blood sample from the Hospital Kuala Lumpur doctors to test for HIV and also DNA samples.

‘I warned Gani’

Mat Zain said the origin of the black-eye probe problem lay in Abdul Gani’s decision to appoint Dr Abdul Rahman Yusof on Oct 26, 1998, to prepare “the fabricated medical report” on Anwar when already a total of eight other doctors had examined the former deputy prime minister and completed their respective reports.

NONEMat Zain produced a copy of Dr Abdul Rahman’s expert report dated Oct 26, 1998, in which he states that he was appointed and was under the instruction of Abdul Gani.

“I told Gani that appointing Dr Abdul Rahman would give rise to complications.

“Besides Dr Abdul Rahman does not have legal standing and had also been under investigation for ‘criminal intimidation’ based on a report lodged by a senior pathologist who had examined and prepared Anwar’s official medical report.”

Dr Abdul Rahman’s first report said Anwar’s injury could have been self-inflicted, in total contradiction to the other medical reports.

Mohtar grudge against Anwar?

Mat Zain said Mahathir had suspected something amiss and the cabinet decided to call for an RCI.

“On Jan 27, 1998, when the RCI was announced, I met up with a then full minister whom I personally know for several years before to inquire on the need to have the RCI when my investigation were complete and the assailant identified, and the PM was briefed by me on Oct 8.

During the conversation, the late minister told him that the then AG – the late Mohtar Abdullah – was quite angry with Anwar for exposing the photo of him and his wife taken together with tycoon Vincent Tan and senior lawyer VK Lingam and their spouses during their group vacation in Spain and Italy.

eusoff chin and vk lingam 210606 italy with vincent tan“The late minister did not say whether the photo (right) expose had anything to do with what happened in the black-eye investigation or any other investigations on Anwar, but it was a fact Mohtar’s relationship with Anwar was affected,” he said.

The photo which made the rounds in the public domain was also brought up during the Lingam RCI in 2007.

Nevertheless, Mat Zain said Dr Abdul Rahman was appointed again on Dec 1, 1998 by Mohtar.

He maintains that he did not know whether Abdul Gani had informed Mohtar that he (Abdul Gani) had already appointed Dr Abdul Rahman or that the Oct 26 medical  report’s existence, and whether Mohtar was also in the loop to object to the appointment.

NONE“That is for Abdul Gani to clarify. However, had Mohtar (right) been told about Dr Abdul Rahman’s background and yet appointed him again on Dec 1, I would say it was silly of him to have done so since the fabrication trail can easily be backtracked.”

“But had Gani not told Mohtar about Dr Abdul Rahman, then Gani must have intended to put Mohtar in that sticky situation in order to exculpate himself (Abdul Gani).

“After the December appointment, Dr Abdul Rahman went on to prepare two more reports taking the total to three, including the one instructed by Abdul Gani two months earlier. The doctor went on to give false testimony during the RCI.

“Whether such testimony had the blessings from AGC (Attorney-General’s Chambers) or otherwise is also for Abdul Gani to clarify,” the former top cop said.

Why no IPs to AG

Mat Zain also alleged that Gani had given some classified and restricted documents from the investigation papers to Dr Abdul Rahman – who was not an authorised person – to help him fabricate the reports.

This, he said, can be proved when the doctor himself had recorded them in the Oct 26 report.

He said although the AG had demanded his investigation papers on the black eye on Feb 13, 1999, he did not comply as the RCI was about to commence on Feb 22, 1999 and all preparations had to be in place.

musa gani aca 110708 arrival“I did not want the AG to stifle the RCI. I know what they are capable of, especially Abdul Gani (left).

“Moreover, the AGC had no power to force me to surrender the IP (investigation papers) at that point of time.

“Most importantly, I had discussed the matter with the then acting IGP Norian Mai, that the police can be exonerated through the RCI after the adverse press statement by Mohtar sometime in January 1999,  touching on police capabilities and professionalism.

“This became the basis for the cabinet to form the RCI. True enough the police were officially exonerated after that.”

Instead, he said the documents and evidence recorded in the RCI are all unfavourable to the Attorney-General’s Chambers, in particular Abdul Gani.

Doc’s report mysteriously withdrawn

He also pointed out that while two of Dr Abdul Rahman’s three reports were submitted to the RCI, the first dated Oct 26, was mysteriously withdrawn before the RCI’s final report was presented to the Agong.

“Hence, people do not know that Dr Abdul Rahman was appointed earlier by Abdul Gani himself.

“I have all the three copies of Dr Abdul Rahman’s report to prove what I have been saying all along.

“I have written to the Health Department director-general, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Advisory Board, the solicitor-general over the three reports, but they did not reply.”

Mat Zain added that he even gave Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, a copy of each of all three reports accompanied by a detailed explanation of how it all came about.

He said Anwar did lodge a report against Abdul Gani, Musa, Dr Abdul Rahman and himself sometime in 2008 for fabricating medical reports during the black-eye investigation.

NONEHowever, he said a three -member panel appointed by the solicitor-general, in a majority decision exonerated Abdul Gani and Musa (right), but not Dr Abdul Rahman and himself.

Mat Zain also confirmed that he has issued a legal letter and served on the solicitor-general in July 2009 and is slowly building up his case to be filed at an appropriate time.

He said that he was aware of Musa’s suit against Anwar has been fixed for October for a full trial and that Abdul Gani has put on hold his statement of claim against Anwar although he has issued his letter of demand together with Musa.

“If Abdul Gani is really sincere, all he needs to do is to account in detail, why, with the three expert reports already prepared by the doctor, he needed that many reports of different versions for just a simple and straight-forward assault case?”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s