The story of two disrupters Courting a national disaster

If there is one thing that the last year should have taught many people then it is this – the status quo in India is changing like never before.Any civilized person closely following events in Malaysia is bound to be struck numb with shock at the senseless rape, killing and burning of houses and property of the victims. The worst perpetrator seems to be Catholic Bishop Dr Paul Tan Chee Ing urged Christians No triumph without tribulation the Selangor Islamic Affairs Department (Jais) has no business questioning Christians on their religion, and questioned whether Jais was employing Gestapo-style tactics in raiding the premises of the Bible Society of Malaysia (BSM) yesterday. (The Gestapo is the Nazi-era police used by Adolf Hilter to oppress Jews and minorities.)“Has Jais, with the aid of the police force, become an insidious type of Gestapo in Malaysia?” he asked.

Tan said the raid by Jais and the questioning of BSM staff violated the 10-point agreement reached between Putrajaya and Christian groups on the controversy over the ‘Allah’ issue. repression by extremists who want to embellish their religious credentials. These extremists hope to make their mark by instigating Christians No triumph without tribulation.There is little point in trying to debate who started what and who did what to whom, though of course the perpetrators of the calamity should be punished in an exemplary manner – though chances are they wouldn’t. They wouldn’t, because a crowd action provides sufficient anonymity to bring out the depravity in us as a people.  It is as if anonymity emboldens us to be on our worst conceivable behaviour. After all, even an otherwise peaceful people of Malaysia,No, savagery is not limited to the Rawandan genocide. Something in us keeps us ever-ready to let our savage loose at the slightest or even no provocation, as long as there is an imagined excuse to do so and sufficient anonymity of numbers to hide behind.  That’s why we see gang rapes more than solo acts, perhaps.
A mooted review of the Selangor Non-Islamic Religions (Control of Propagation Among Muslims) Enactment 1988 would bring chaos, warned the Jalur Tiga Malaysia’s (Jati) group president Hasan Mohamed Ali.
The biggest tragedy of such savagery is that it brings out the savage in most of us.  For example, one begins to wonder if even the most savage punishment imaginable, say of the Sharia Law kind, would suffice for the perpetrators of the  crime against, children, women and men.For this utter failure of law enforcement, who is accountable? The politicians? The community leaders? The police? The? Shouldn’t these worthies counsel the people better, even assuming people do not know any better? Unfortunately, practically anything today has become acceptable under the name of politics. Politics  is no longer about unifying the different; it is essentially about playing up the differences, whether on the basis of religion, race, or region.  This is all the more tragic, especially in a state that gave the country a galaxy of leaders in the past. And the police and civil servants mix up their lack of respect for their political bosses with utter disregard for their own responsibilities, and treat the only purpose of their jobs to be self-enrichment; to hell with governance.  After all, why is such a huge mass of humanity in our villages still under such utter poverty, devoid of basic education and without the minimal security of the state, 65 years after Independence, while all we get to hear from our ruling masters are empty words or subsidy schemes which are actually meant to fill their own coffers over and over again? Unfortunately we do not have answers and nor are we likely to have any,
There is a saying, “Without wise leadership, a nation falls, but with good counsellors, there is safety”.
The recent spate of events that have engulfed the nation has amply illustrated that we have neither wise leaders nor good counsellors.
That this is seriously now the case is underpinned by two major arguments.
First, from the way the troubling economy is further mismanaged, and second, the deepening crisis of the racial-religious divide that is almost at a boiling point.
Consequent to the misdirected policies of pursuing and ramping “growth without a socially-just development” end-state, on the back of a much abused “interventionist affirmative action of the New Economic Policy”, the nation finds herself strapped in huge debt and 16 years of fiscal deficit which has now become very ‘toxic’.
With the federal debt that has almost reached the statutory limit of 55% of the nation’s GDP, (RM543.3 billion, to be exact, as of MOF report), even the prime minister-cum-finance minister talks of the imminent bankruptcy. Very unfortunately though, debts were conveniently attributed to the “colossal subsidies” (RM46.7 billion, according to MOF) said to have been spent on the rakyat.
Never were Prime Minister Najib and his ministers abled to admit that the debts were equally or more likely due to the government mega-spending on big ticket infrastructural items in a “pump-priming” mode in both bullish times and bearish times. The PM was either oblivious and remorseless, or worse still, totally inept and clueless.
Leakages due to stupidity bordering negligence, as annually reported by the auditor general, and endemic abuses bordering corruption, epitomised by the PKFZ, NFC and MITP fiascos, are never blamed to be the cause of billions of ringgit being drained or misallocated.
Failures to dismantle monopoly have severely distorted the market and continuing crony-capitalism resulted in a new rentier-class – the likes of Syed Mokhtar al-Bukhary et al, monopolising critical national assets and utilities, and a repeat of Mahathirnomics – of privatisation and a creation of a super-rich Bumiputera-Malay elite class.
It has made nonsense of the effort to achieve the high-income target of US$15,000 or RM48,000 per capita, arguably achievable through a hundred of the richest people in the country, when both income and wealth divide continues to yawn wider yearly.
Let it be known to the PM and his cahoots, lest they are still oblivious, that  statistically, welfare states like the Nordic countries, Austria and the Netherland devoted at least 20% of their national budget to social transfers or subsidy.  You were adamant about introducing the GST in 2015, while allowing leaks to go unchecked. The nation is still caught in a “middle-income trap”, which is irresponsible.
More interestingly, higher social transfers (subsidy) of the welfare state have resulted in less poverty, less inequality and longer expectancy, with statistically no net cost in terms of GDP, economic growth or even budget deficits.
Whether we are looking at the social market economy or an Islamic economy, we shall no longer view at welfare as a “populist” public policy. Welfare spending, as Keynes argues, has its role in stimulating demand when private investment and expenditure dry up, a part of the package of policy instruments to prevent economic crises and keep the market economy on track.
So Mr PM, your arguments that the rationalisation of subsidy (aka withdrawal of subsidy) must be put in place or otherwise the nation is going to go bankrupt, are both pathetic and misguided. Your 11 austerity measures are too little to be of financial significance, though never too late.
Could you promptly revisit your economic measures and take heed of the copious critique, especially from among the economists who are not out there to curry favours?
Their honest assessment that your so-called ‘rationalisation of subsidy’ are triggering more than ‘double-whammy’ on the rakyat’s well-being  particularly on the bottom 40%, and more so on their purchasing power to drive domestic demand, are surely noteworthy.
Let us now turn to another critical dimension of your ineptness to run this ailing nation.
As early as the first week of 2014, your deputy’s non-committal statement on Selangor Umno division’s intention, together with Muslim NGOs, that they are free to decide on staging a demonstration tomorrow in front of churches, is extremely regrettable.
Rather than dispensing advice and calling for restraint and respect for each other’s religious beliefs and conviction, his response is interpreted as a callous endorsement for such actions that spells doom for this nation.
It heralds the beginning of a troubled year of a deepening religious divide in an already fractious society. The divisive debate and emotive legal issue over the word “Allah” has been raging unabated and no effective efforts, much less solutions, are in sight.
The unfortunate raid and seizure of copies of the Bible by the Selangor Islamic Department (Jais) at the Bible Society of Malaysia (BSM) has added salts to injury. The stage is now set for a legal wrangling on this issue, compounding and exacerbating further the “Allah” debate.
Arguably, in 2011 the cabinet has allowed the printing and importation of the Bible in any language and the seizure contravened this decision.
Whether Jais is rightly under the state government, the sultan or the federal government, has now come into the limelight.
Be that as it may, the high-handed actions of Jais have now come under severe condemnation from many quarters. Whether Jais has religious jurisdiction over non-Muslim scriptures, would finally underscore the imperative need to address the “Allah” issue.
While Article 11 (4) of the Federal Constitution (FC) allows for state and federal laws to control or restrict propagation of other religions among Muslims, this did not affect one’s right to profess and manage one’s religion under Articles 11 (1) and (3) which include the use of words, language, worship and other aspects of practising a religion.
Likewise, the unsolicited edict or fatwa by the Mufti of Perak, condemning the demonstrators of last Saturday’s Turun campaign on price hike, young activists of the civil and students’ societies, arguing carelessly, their blood “as halal” as they are “traitors of the nation” or bughah as known in Islamic legal terminology, is both bigoted and smacks of political partisanship.
But where were you again Mr PM?
This surely is not the way to run this already divided nation. You keep mum and your deafening silence are disquieting at best.
As we get from bad to worse, I must say in all earnestness that the time for a real national reconciliation has finally arrived.
It is not about forging “A Unity Government” as such, but about implementing critical institutional reforms and structural measures that must be put in place soonest.
Should you shirk your responsibility again, you do it at your own peril.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s